The Role of Agency Theory in Corporate Governance
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/GettyImages-2155192216-fd6d700a3a4c46a49f17bb5911f2788c.jpg)
Agency theory is used to understand the relationships between principals (shareholders) and agents (corporate directors or managers). The agent represents the principal in a particular business transaction and is expected to represent the principal’s best interests without regard for self-interest.
The shift from dispersed to concentrated ownership has heightened agency conflicts, leading to increased corruption within corporate structures. The different interests of principals and agents may become a source of conflict, as some agents may not perfectly act in the principal’s best interests. The resulting miscommunication and disagreement may result in various problems and discord within companies. Incompatible desires may drive a wedge between stakeholders and cause inefficiencies and financial losses, leading to a principal-agent problem.
Key Takeaways
- Agency theory explores the relationship between principals (such as shareholders) and agents (such as corporate directors or managers) in organizations.
- When agents and principals’ interests come into conflict, a principal-agent problem can arise that may result in inefficiencies, mismanagement, or self-serving behaviors from managers.
- A company will need to address the conflict by auditing, board oversight, and other mechanisms in order to realign the interests of the agent and the principal.
- Corporate governance can create incentives for an agent to act in the best interests of the principal, using agency theory to help design appropriate incentives and resolve conflicts.
- Agency loss is a metric that is used to determine whether an agent acts in the principal’s best interest.
The Principal-Agent Problem Explained
Principal-agent theory explores the relationship between principals (shareholders or employers) and agents (such as managers or employees) who act on their behalf. The theory highlights the challenges that may arise when the agent’s interests diverge from the principal’s, potentially leading to conflicts and inefficiencies.
The principal-agent problem occurs when the interests of a principal and agent come into conflict. Companies should seek to minimize these situations through solid corporate policy. These conflicts present normally ethical individuals with opportunities for moral hazard. Incentives may be used to redirect the agent’s behavior to realign these interests with the principal’s concerns.
One way to address the principal-agent problem is by implementing mechanisms such as auditing, board oversight, and appointing independent directors to help align the interests of both parties.
Enron Scandal
A real-world example of a principal-agent problem is the Enron scandal, in which executives used deceptive accounting practices to hide billions in losses from shareholders, prioritizing personal gain over investor interests.
Role of Corporate Governance in Agency Theory
Corporate governance can be used to change the agent’s rules and restore the principal’s interests. By employing the agent to represent the principal’s interests, the principal must overcome a lack of information about the agent’s performance of the task. Agents must have incentives to act according to the principal’s interests.
Agency theory may be used to design these incentives appropriately by considering what interests motivate the agent to act. Incentives that encourage wrong behavior must be removed, and rules that discourage moral hazards must be established. Understanding the mechanisms that create problems helps businesses develop better corporate policy.
Measuring Agency Loss
The standard of “agency loss” has emerged as a commonly used metric to determine whether or not an agent acts in their principal’s best interest. Strictly defined, agency loss is the difference between the optimal results for the principal and the consequences of the agent’s behavior. For example, agency loss is zero when an agent routinely performs with the principal’s best interest in mind. But the further an agent’s actions diverge from the principal’s best interests, the greater the agency loss becomes.
Agency loss drops when the following situations occur:
- The agent and principal hold similar interests and desire the same outcome.
- The principal is mindful of the agent’s activities and is keenly aware of the level of service they are receiving.
If neither of these scenarios is present, agency loss is likely to climb. Therefore, the chief challenge involves persuading agents to prioritize their principal’s best interest while placing their self-interest second. If done correctly, the agent will nurture their principal’s wealth, while incidentally enriching their bottom lines.
Why Is Agency Theory Important?
Agency theory provides a framework for understanding and addressing conflicts of interest between key stakeholders within a company or organization, such as shareholders and management. It can help identify ways to offset business risks and better align the interests of all parties. It’s especially valuable in corporate finance and governance, where the principal-agent problem can result in inefficiencies, mismanagement, or self-serving behaviors from managers.
What Are the Duties of the Agency Theory?
The duties focus on the relationship between the principal and the agent, primarily aligning the agent’s actions with the principal’s interests. This may include legal obligations such as fiduciary duty and duty of obedience, for example.
What Is an Example of Agency Theory in Business?
Shareholders hire a company’s CEO to run the business. However, while shareholders aim to maximize profits and per-share value, the CEO may have goals that don’t fully align with those shareholder objectives. For example, the CEO might pursue business opportunities that boost their own pay and bonuses, but don’t grow the business or create value for shareholders.
The Bottom Line
Agency theory plays a crucial role in corporate governance, as it addresses conflicts of interest between shareholders (principals) and management (agents). Organizations must provide a framework to align the interests of both parties; this may include mechanisms like incentives, board oversight, and independent audits, which can all help minimize inefficiencies and potential mismanagement.
link